| « CO2 sources | « CCS in brief |
| « Capture | « Transport |
| « Storage | « See also |
Today coal power plants like the one below emit large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere. There are more than thousand coal power plants like this worldwide, and they represent about 30 % of global man-made CO2 emissions.
|
In addition to coal power plants, we also get a lot of CO2 emissions from gas power plants, refineries and industrial plants that produce steel, cement and ammonia. Worldwide, there are 8000 large plants emitting about half of global man-made CO2 emissions. The other half of man-made CO2 emissions stem mainly from transportation and buildings.
Check out a map of the large CO2 sources.
The purpose of CCS is to stop CO2 emissions from large point sources like coal power plants, without closing down the plant. In order to illustrate how CCS works, you can compare the two illustrations below. The first one is a coal power plant today, without CCS, where the CO2 is emitted directly into the atmosphere. The second illustration is a coal power plant equipped with CCS technology.
|
The concept of CCS is portrayed in the illustration below where a coal power plant is equipped with CCS. Instead of emitting the CO2 to the atmosphere, the flue gas from the power plant goes directly to large tanks where the CO2 is separated from other components in the flue gas, mainly nitrogen. The harmless components like nitrogen are then released to the atmosphere, while the CO2 is captured. The CO2 is now ready to be transported in a pipeline to a safe storage site.
|
CO2 can be stored underground at special storage sites. In most cases the storage sites are located some distance away from the power plants, which means that CO2 has to be transported to a proper storage location.
From a technical and economic point of view there is no point in storing all of the flue gas coming out of a coal power plant. The flue gas contains only 10 percent CO2. It is better to separate the CO2 from the other components (mainly steam and nitrogen, but also some particles, sulfur, etc.) to get the smallest possible volume for transport and storage. Furthermore, the other components in the flue gas would cause corrosion problems and would contaminate the storage site. Therefore, the only feasible solution is to separate CO2 from the other components in the flue gas. This separation process is often referred to as CO2 capture.
There are many different technologies for CO2 capture, one of which is described here to illustrate the concept. A detailed description of the different technologies available are given in a separate site on CO2 capture.
Capturing CO2 from the flue gas of a power plant is often referred to as post-combustion CO2 capture, because CO2 is removed after (i.e. post) the combustion in the power plant. This process is illustrated below.
|
In the figure above the flue gas from a power plant, or an industrial plant, enters the left tank. A liquid solvent is also added to this tank, and this solvent reacts with CO2, but not with the other components of the flue gas, like nitrogen. The nitrogen gas flows through the tank and leaves at the top of the tank. The liquid solvent, which has reacted with the CO2, leaves at the bottom of the tank.
Typical solvents are chemical compounds like amines or ammonia dissolved in water. These solvents cannot be transported or stored together with the CO2 because they are hazardous and expensive. The solvents are therefore regenerated so that they can be reused.
In the right tank the solvent-CO2 mixture is heated, and the bonds between solvent and CO2 are broken. The CO2 is then released and leaves the top of the second tank as gas. The pure amine leaves the bottom of the right tank and is recirculated to the first tank.
The amount of energy needed for heating the mixture of solvent and CO2 is substantial. In fact, approximately one-third of the energy produced by the power plant is needed for this heating process. This means that the power plant must use a large part of its power production to run the CO2 capture plant. This represents a substantial cost, which is one of the reasons why CCS has not been widely implemented yet.
The CO2 collected by the CO2 capture plant is transported to a suitable storage location. Prior to transport, however, the CO2 must be dried and compressed. Drying is necessary to remove all water which can otherwise cause serious corrosion problems. Compression is necessary to increase the pressure and reduce the volume of CO2 to be transported.
There are two transport options; ship or pipeline.
|
In general, ship transport is the cheapest solution for small volumes and large distances, while pipelines are cheapest for large volumes and longer distances.
CO2 is stored more than 800 meters below ground. It cannot be stored everywhere, but only in locations where we are sure it will not leak out again.
|
There are several storage options. One of the most obvious is storage in oil and gas fields. The CO2 can either be injected into depleted oil and gas fields for pure storage, or it can be injected into producing oil and gas fields in order to push out more oil and gas. This is referred to as enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and enhanced gas recovery (EGR).
The storage capacity in oil and gas fields is limited. Another storage option which is even more promising are aquifers. An aquifer is porous sandstone where water is present naturally in the pores in the sand. If CO2 is injected it can occupy the pores just like water does, or it can even be dissolved into the water. Such aquifers are found all over the world and have the greatest capacity for CO2 storage.
Only aquifers containing salt water are suitable for CO2 storage. Aquifers containing fresh water will not be used for CO2 storage, because such aquifers can be used for the production of drinking water.
Another limitation is the quality of the bedrock. CO2 injected into an aquifer is buoyant, meaning that it will try to move upwards. This necessitates a lid or cover on top of the aquifer to stop the CO2 from moving upwards. Such a lid can be a thick layer of impermeable mud or clay, as in the illustration above.
Storage safety
Aquifers suitable for CO2 storage are found all over the world, but careful selection of storage sites is required to ensure CO2 storage without leakage. One should not use aquifers in areas with a high risk of earthquakes. Furthermore, as stated above, there must be an impermeable layer on top of the aquifer, also called a caprock. Therefore, before CO2 storage can take place it is necessary to conduct geological surveys to ensure that the caprock really is impermeable to the CO2.
If a storage site is carefully selected after comprehensive characterisation of the geology, the risk of leakage is very low. According to scientific studies, more than 99 percent of the CO2 injected will remain stored after thousands of years.
Actually, the safety of the storage increases as times goes by. Just after the CO2 has been injected, the CO2 will not leak due to the caprock.
|
As times goes by the CO2 will start to dissolve in the water. This naturally occuring process lowers the risk of leakage because the water has already been trapped in the aquifer for millions of years. After several thousands of years, the CO2 will react with other minerals and form solid limestone, which is the safest form of CO2 storage.
|
Interested in more information? Read more about: