| « Positive environmental effects | « Emission from capture plants |
| « Natural resources | « Leakages |
| « See also |
There is one very big positive effect of CCS: It reduces CO2 emissions.
The potential to reduced CO2 emissions is large. In fact, one-third of the global CO2 emissions can be reduced by CCS by 2050 according to a Bellona Study.
This positive environmental effect of CCS overshadows the possible negative effects listed above, provided that the possible negative effects are properly addressed by all stakeholders.
CO2 capture is often performend in absorption processes with amines. Portions of the amines will degrade, leading to large volumes of degraded amine that must be handled as hazardous waste.
Other capture processes uses ammonia as the absorbent. This can lead to minor emissions of ammonia.
The CO2 stream to be injected should consist of overwhelmingly CO2. No other components should be added to the CO2 stream to be injected because it could potentially pollute the underground with hazardous wastes.
The stream coming out of a CO2 capture plant should also be properly cleaned so that other components, like sulphur, nitrous components, metals, and particles, are removed prior to the CO2 injection.
As an example of the importance of only injecting overwhelmingly CO2 it can be mentioned that if mercury is injected together with the CO2, the mercury can migrate over much larger distances underground than CO2. That means that even if CO2 is safely stored, mercury could migrate for long distances and, in the worst case, contaminate natural resources like fresh ground water.
If the stored CO2 leaks out, the CO2 can harm local terresteral and marine ecosystems close to the injection point. If huge volumes burst out, the CO2 can replace oxygen leading to lethal conditions.
The good news is that it is possible to avoid CO2 leakage and ensure safe storage.
However, there are many challenges related to CO2 storage that must be addressed: